Email this site to a contact
Using-up
over 4,000 hours of my life = c. 3 whole years,
based on a 35-hour week - as a VICTIM OF CRIME - desperately trying
to get justice and redress. THIS IS ENGLISH INJUSTICE IN ACTION - IN A FREE FOR ALL ENVIRONMENT
|
| You are here > Home > Document Library |
|
Document Library
This section outlines my soul-destroying, desperate attempts to implement the rights I have been told by the State I have the right to demand, under a system of public sector departments and so-called 'regulators' I have been told have the mandate / remit to protect me and help me implement 'my rights' - leading me to engage in more than 40 battles (at January 2010), that
have cost me THREE WHOLE YEARS OF MY LIFE (based on a 35-hour week), writing hundreds of documents.
|
BECAUSE IT ALL TURNED OUT TO BE LIES...
...AS MY EXPERIENCE DEMONSTRATES ...
...THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS IN REALITY |
Sections
(1) The more than 40 battles
The following represents the sequence of the
main correspondence in the context of these more than 40
battles. All documents are hyperlinked to the
source document.
NB. These documents are in addition
to hundreds of letters I
have had to write since the beginning of this
horrendous and very traumatic nightmare in
2002.
|
Letters
prior to escalating to next level |
Next
level |
Next
level |
Time
from complaint to launch of site |
TRIBUNAL AND COURTS |
2002- 03 London Leasehold
Valuation Tribunal (LVT) and John Prescott's Office
(See also: (1) Ministry of (In)Justice; (2) My MP and Parliamentary Ombudsman) |
Following
'Steel Services' =Andrew Ladsky - Martin Russell Jones 7
Aug 02 application to
the LVT - which resulted in report LVT/SC/007/120/02 (ref #992 on LVT database) - FAILING ITS REMIT
LVT 8
Oct 02, informing that SS-MRJ made 7 Aug 02 application to LVT (hence 2 months later)
LVT 10
Oct 02, informing of 29 Oct 02 pre-trial hearing (= waited another 2 days, and gave less than 2 weeks notice)
Mine 22
Oct 02 - SS does not exist; Qs costs
Mine 24 Oct 02 - CKFT threatening me with forfeiture; say aware LVT LVT 29
Oct 02 pre-trial directions
LVT 29 Oct 02 leaflet "Court of Appeal case Daejan Properties v. LVTs “LVTs only have the jurisdiction to decide the reasonableness of disputed service charges that are still unpaid”
Mine 25
Nov 02 - MRJ not complying with directions
Mine 9
Dec02 - advise as SS has filed claim in WLCC
LVT 11
Dec 02 = Get lost!
Mine 18
Dec 02 - MRJ not complying with directions
Mine 12
Jan 03 to LVT - postpone 5 Feb 03 hearing as MRJ not complied with directions
Mine 12
Jan 03 to Hathaway, MRICS, MRJ, ccd LVT
Hathaway, MRICS, MRJ, 8 Oct 02, 20 Jan 03 and 4 Apr 03 LIES to LVT
Brian Gale, MRICS, LIES in 13 Dec 02 and 24 Feb 03 "Expert Witness" reports to LVT LVT 6
Feb 03 - substantive hearing postponed to 13 Mar 03
LVT 27
Mar 03 - hearing on 28 Apr 03
LVT 21 Jul 03 to Lanny Silverstone, CKFT - job of LVT is to determine global sum
My solicitors 7 Apr 03 to LVT and MRJ - I will make 20C application
Mine 30
Jul 03 - asking for a 20C order
LVT 1
Aug 03 - application form for 20C
Mine - 20C application 10
Aug 03 and covering
letter 12
Aug 03 "SS can't be allowed to put LVT costs on service charges"
LVT 14
Aug 03 - "copy of application sent to respondent"
LVT to CKFT 26
Aug 03 - agreeing to CKFT asking to delay hearing
LVT 29
Aug 03 - setting hearing for 8 Oct 03 |
Complaint - 6 Sep 03
request to Siobhan McGrath, President LVTs, for summary of 17
June 2003 'determination'
McGrath's 12
Sep 03 - "cannot reopen a decision"
Office
of Deputy Prime Minister 6
Oct 03 = Get lost!
Mine 6 Oct 03 to McGrath - "it's aboout your tribunal doing its job"
Mine to McGrath 9
Nov 03 - "add summary; ensure factually accurate summary on online database"
McGrath 26
Nov03 = NO!
|
|
Nearly
three years |
CONCLUSIONS
(1) Over 250 hours of
my life (= SEVEN WEEKS, based
on 35-hour week), including writing
to the Head of LVTs, as well
as writing to the media
(2) £30,000 (US$53,000)
of my very hard-earned life savings, over many years = more than twice the amount of the fraudulent service charge demand of £14,400
(3) an unbelievable amount
of torment, anguish and distress - including,
post issuing its 17 Jun 03 report. LVT/SC/007/120/02, as the
London LVT FAILED TO PERFORM ITS LEGAL REMIT - as defined under s.19 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985,
by NOT including a summary of
the impact of its determination
on the "reasonableness of
the global sum demanded" - resulting
in an on-going battle in the
courts with CKFT over the following
year - and beyond, as the 2nd fraudulent claim filed against me on 27 February 2007, also in WLCC, was also relevant.
This has also led me to spend thousands more in costs.
Furthermore, the summary of the case on the
LVT's database, reference #992, blames me for
the LVT action. This amounts to libel under the Defamation Act 1952 and 1996
(See my 2 Jan 09 Subject Access Request to the Ministry of (In)Justice, and my 12 Jul 09 complaint to the Parlamentary Ombudsman for key events) |
2002- 04
West
London County Court (WLCC)
and Wandsworth County Court (WCC)
and Lord
Falconer of Thoroton
(See below year 2007)
(See also: (1) Ministry of (In)Justice; (2) My MP and Parliamentary Ombudsman) |
WLCC FRAUDULENT claim ref: WL
203 537 filed against me and 10
of my fellow leaseholders -representing 14
flats- on 29 Nov 02
Mine to LVT 9
Dec 02 - advise as SS has filed claim in WLCC
LVT 11 Dec 02 = Get lost!
Mine to WLCC 10
Dec 02 - same action in LVT
Mine to WLCC 17
Dec 02 - "Action to be stayed because same in LVT"
My
17 Dec 02 Defence to claim - same action in LVT; lease different mine
WLCC 24 Jan 03 "ask CKFT if want to stay action"
CKFT 23 Jan 03 asking for copy of my lease
WLCC 21
Mar 03 - FALSELY telling me that a Charging Order concerns me
Mine to WLCC 25
Mar 03 - "Action to be stayed; can't be; LVT said to NOT pay"
WLCC 27
Mar 03 - "Your request will be considered at 4 Apr 03 hearing"
Mine 30
Mar 03 to LVT, ccd
WLCC - "How can... two government departments...made aware of a conflict as a result of actions they are concurrently undertaking - have no line of communication?"
Mine to WLCC 1
Apr 03 - "appalled by unbelievable anxiety and stress you caused me"
CKFT 23 May 03 application for case mgt hearing; that "claimant has obtained judgment or settled proceedings against all Defendants, except" - which lists 4
WLCC 12
Jun 03 Notice of hearing - without any explanation
Mine to WLCC 17
Jun 03 - "Until there is a decision from LVT: what can you enforce?"
Mine to WLCC 22
Jun 03 - "I have leave of appeal to Lands Tribunal; you are subjecting me to double jeopardy"
WLCC 23
Jun 03 - "Judge advises you attend 24 Jun 03 hearing"
WLCC 24 Jun 03 Order that SS pays my (and fellow leaseholders's costs) for the day
Mine to WLCC 15
Jul 03 - SS-MRJ not implementing LVT 'determination'
Silverstone, CKFT, 17 Jul 03 to judge that "I am wrong" = a liar
Mine to WLCC 9
Aug 03 - "no deal with CKFT; costs must be same for ALL leaseholders"
Ayesha Salim, CKFT, 6 Aug 03 application for summary judgment against me (et.al.)
WLCC 18
Aug 03 Notice 26 Aug 03 hearing
WLCC 26
Aug 03 order
RCJ's Citizens Advice Bureau
to WLCC 2
Apr 04
WLCC 21
Apr 04 Order to SS to file listing questionnaire
RCJ CAB's 25 May 04 to WLCC that I will miss 28 May hearing because WLCC failed to follow instructions
WLCC 28
May 04 - Judge Madge freebie Order that claim against me "stayed"
Transcript of 28 May 04 hearing
Ayesha Salim CKFT, 28 May 04 "accept my wording consent order"
WLCC 9
Jun 04 Notice of "transfer of [my] case to Wandsworth County Court for trial" - no reason given
Mine 20 Jun 04 to WLCC - why trial? WLCC - consent order 1 July 2004 - also copied to me by Salim on 14 Jul 04
Mine to WCC 8
July 04 - no reply to my 20 Jun 04; you sent wrong tape
Mine to WLCC 8
Jul 04 - why trial?
Mine to WCC 19
Jul 04 - fax to capture conversation with court staff: confirmed I am Defendant in trial, to send copy Consent order because WCC has not kept
Mine to WCC 22
Jul 04 - "if trial concerns me: no info; you are subjecting me to cruelty and persecution"
WCC 23
Jul 04 - "You are not required to attend..."
WCC 28
Jul 04 - trial is for 5th Defendant
WCC 2
Aug 04 Order against 5th Defendant - showing great injustice |
'Cry
for help' of 29 Jun 04 to Lord
Falconer of Thoroton - IN VAIN!
'Customer Service' 'reply' of 23
Aug 04 = absolved court staff of any wrongdoing, through deceit, as well as by treating me as a liar and an illiterate imbecile
|
|
Over
two years |
CONCLUSIONS
(1) Over 200 hours of
my life (= SIX WEEKS, based on
a 35-hour week), including writing
to Lord Falconer
(2) Over £10,000
(US$17,000) in legal fees (Healeys,
Piper Smith Basham, Butcher Burns,
Pliener, Staddon) and other costs,
such as transcript of 24 May
2004 hearing, etc.
(3) An indescribable amount
of torment, anguish, distress
and mental torture over a period of ONE YEAR AND
NINE MONTHS - and
continued anguish and distress for a long time afterwards due to District Judge Madge opting to give a freebie to Ayesha Salim's client, Andrew Ladsky by issuing a 28 May 2004 Order that the claim against me be "stayed" - in the absolute knowledge that agreement had been reached. (Steps were taken to ensure that I would miss the hearing by sending the Notice to the RCJ's CAB - instead of sending it to me)
(See my 2 Jan 09 Subject Access Request to the Ministry of (In)Justice, and my 12 Jul 09 complaint to the Parlamentary Ombudsman for key events)
What took place in these nighmare, hell hole courts is COLLUSION with SS = Andrew Ladsky and his mob... And events in 2007-08 provide absolute confirmation of this. |
2007- 08 West London County Court (WLCC) - Post 2004 and Her Majesty Court Service (HMCS)'s 'Customer Service'
(See above for Years 2002-2004,
and below, Supreme Court Costs Office
and related, also below: Portner and Jaskel Year 2007-09)
(See also: (1) Ministry of (In)Justice; (2) My MP and Parliamentary Ombudsman) |
WLCC FRAUDULENT claim, 7WL00675, 27 Feb 07, with TWO 'claimants' ; EACH with different solicitors ; EACH demanding different amount - Filed by Portner and Jaskel
My 22 Mar 07 Acknowledgment of Service - highlighting there are 2 names; 2 firms; 2 different sums (NB: over the following 16 months I raised the issue a total of 11 TIMES)
WLCC 3 Apr 07 'Notice that acknowledgment of service filed' - FALSELY stating that I "intend to defend part of the claim"
My 4 Apr 07 application to contest jurisdiction - cc'd Ahmet Jaffer, Portner on 30 Jun 07
WLCC 19 Apr 07 Order (posted on 27), hearing for 8 May, Skeleton Argument by 3 May 07; refused Portner's application for judgment against me My 30 Apr 07 fax asking for extension
District Judge Nicholson 1 May 07 order - 1 day extension
My 3 May 07 Skeleton Argument, cc'd Jeremy Hershkorn, Portner
My 4 May 07 fax to WLCC asking for letter from Portner
WLCC 4 May 07 that hearing postponed to 24 Aug 07
My 30 Jun 07 demand for amended 3 Apr 07 Notice Acknow filed
My 12 Aug 07 letter highlighting still no skeleton argument from Portner, ccd Ahmet Jaffer, Portner
My 16 Aug 07 letter that still no skeleton argument from Portner; ccd Ahmet Jaffer, Portner
My 22 Aug 07 fax that, in its 22 Aug 07 so-called 'skeleton argument', Portner lies by claiming it has not received mine; cc'd Jaffer,Portner
My 22 Aug 07 statement of costs to Portner, ccd WLCC 'Deputy' District Judge McGovern 24 Aug 07 Order refusing my application for transfer to LVT - and that I pay £293 to "Roostock Overseas Corp"
My 28 Aug 07 demand for tape of hearing
My 12 Sep 07 "Defence & Counterclaim"
My 13 Sep 07 letter to prove delivery of my "Defence & Counterclaim" to Portner
WLCC 27 Sep 07 letter masquerading as an order - asking me to pay £1,700 to "file a counterclaim" and threatening to "strike out my (non-existent) counterclaim" - hence my Defence!
My 2 Oct 07 letter challenging Portner's 26 Sep 07 'defence to counterclaim'
My 7 Oct 07 to Beverley F Nunnery that WLCC only sent my application for tape on 14 Sep = day I was due to file my Defence My 14 Oct 07 letter chasing reply to my 2 Oct 07
My 14 Oct 07 letter chasing amended version of 3 Apr 07 Notice
My 28 Oct 07 letter chasing reply to my 2 Oct 07 letter
My 28 Oct 07 letter chasing amended version of 3 Apr 07 Notice
WLCC 11 Jan 08 amended version of 3 Apr 07 Notice = 7 months AFTER request!!
WLCC 19 Dec 07 'order' from District Judge Nicholson, posted on 7 Jan 08 - to "strike-out" my non-existent counterclaim of, allegedly, 12 Sep 07 = 4 months later!!!
WLCC 11 Jan 08 'allocation questionnaire' (I did not return this one)
My 26 Jan 08 letter to "A Judge committed to the concept of Justice, c/o WLCC)" - asking for transfer of my case to another court; ccd Jaffer WLCC 7 Mar 08 allocation questionnaire and threat to "strike-out my Defence"
My 14 Mar 08 Allocation Q and 3 additional sheets summarising issues; cc'd Jaffer, Portner
District Judge Ryan 9 Apr 08 so-called 'case management directions' - written "without considering representation from the parties" (NB !!! v. my 14 Mar 08 Allocation Questionr)
WLCC 18 Apr 08 notice of trial (on 21 Aug 08)
My 30 Apr 08 application to WLCC to vary 9 Apr 07 directions "in the interests of justice and efficiency"
District Judge Nicholson 9 May 08 order refusing my application
My 14 May 08 reply to District Judge Nicholson, ccd Jack Straw 'Justice' Secretary
My 6 May 08 Standard Disclosure - to Jaffer, Portner
Jaffer 23 May 08 ccd WLCC suggesting 'multi track'
My (74 pg) 3 Jun 08 Witness Statement; (4 pg Main Points) (NB: as per 9 Apr 08 so-called 'case mgt directions' - I sent only to Portner)
My 5 Jun 08 that 'Claimant' has not sent witness statement = implications
"Rootstock" 6 Jun 08 Notice of Discontinuance of "ALL of the claim" against me
My 22 Jul 08 to copy on my Notice Commencement Assesssment Costs and Statement of Case for costs
My 26 Aug 08 reply to Ladsky's 11 Aug 08 'points of dispute' re. my 26 Jun 08 Statement of Costs, and application for assessment hearing 12 Sep 08 Notice of 4 Nov 08 Detailed Assessment hearing District Judge Nicholson 4 Nov 08 Order for transfer of detailed assessment hearing to Supreme Court Costs Office
My 11 Nov 08 letter to copy on my 11 Nov 08 letter and enclosures to Portner |
My 13 Nov 07 complaint to Kevin Pogson, Regional Director, Her Majesty Court Service (HMCS)'s 'Customer Service'
'Customer Service' Officer 15 Nov 07 initial reply I will hear in "two weeks"
'Customer Service' Officer 29 Nov 07 letter: "reply in next two weeks"
My 5 Dec 07 reply: "transfer my case immediately to another court"
'Customer Service' Officer 10 Dec 07 letter, totally ignoring my demand; "response in next 2 weeks"
'Customer Service' Officer 20 Dec 07 'reply' to my complaint: deceit + failed to address my complaint
My 27 Dec 07 reply “...I demand that my case is immediately transferred to a court and a judge committed to operating under CPR’s ‘Overriding Objective’"
Other 'Customer Service' Officer, 2 Jan 08 = back to square one |
My 11 Dec 07 letter to Jack Straw, 'Justice' Secretary, asking for assistance
HMCS Petty France 'Customer Service' initial 21 Dec 07 acknowledgement
My 27 Dec 07 reply
Paulette James OBE, 'Customer Service' Unit, Petty France, 10 Jan 08 "reply to my complaint" = sickening cover-up, deceit, failure to assume responsibility, tirivialising / ignoring 'inconvenient' parts of my complaint
My 28 Jan 08 reply to Paulette James' 10 Jan 08 - headed "Absolute confirmation of collusion"
HMCS (3rd person) Petty France 24 Jan 08 follow-up to my complaint
My 18 Feb 08 letter to Jack Straw, ccd WLCC and Jaffer, Portner - re. WLCC silence following my 26 Jan 08 letter to "A Judge committed to the concept of Justice" |
(Site launched in Autumn 06)
My 26 January 2008 letter "To: A Judge committed to the concept of Justice" - asking for transfer of case out of WLCC |
CONCLUSIONS
If there was any doubt of COLLUSION between WLCC, Andrew Ladsky and his mob in 2002-04 in relation to the previous fraudulent claim against me, there is ABSOLUTELY NONE in relation to this 2nd FRAUDULENT claim against me. Ladsky obviously has a VERY SPECIAL relationship with the WLCC judges, court manager and other court staff who evidently perceive themselves as being in his employ - leading to the conclusion that, in the case of WLCC, the Court Service should be renamed 'His Majesty's Court Service'..
As detailed in my 19 January 2009 Amended reply to the Points of Dispute, Since March 2007 West London County Court has cost me [ ]
(See my 2 Jan 09 Subject Access Request to the Ministry of (In)Justice, and my 12 Jul 09 complaint to the Parlamentary Ombudsman for key events) |
30 JAN 2009 Supreme Court Costs Office (SCCO) |
18 Dec 08 Notice from SCCO of detailed assessment hearing on 30 Jan 09
My 22 Jan 09 covering letter for delivery of bundle - and list of documents in bundle
4 Feb 09 Final Costs Certificate |
No point wasting my time complaining; opted to include in my 2 Jan 10 Subject Access Request |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
|
2010 Ministry of (In)Justice (MoJ)
(see also WLCC |
My 2 Jan 10 Subject Access Request |
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
[ ]
Back to list |
SOLICITORS AND BARRISTERS |
2003- 04 Piper
Smith Basham, Law Society and Legal
Services Ombudsman and Lord
Falconer of Thoroton |
(Ongoing battles, detailed in my 16 Mar 04 complaint to the Law Society)
Mine 2
Dec 03 to Piper
Smith Basham (which I view as an extremely
generous letter)
'Reply' 18
Dec 03 = Get lost!
Mine 24
Jan 04
'Reply' 30
Jan 04 |
Complaint to Law Society (LS) 16
Mar 04
LS 2
Jun 04
Mine 17
Jun 04
PSB 1
Jul 04
LS 3
Aug 04
Mine 16
Aug 04
PSB 25
Aug 04
LS 22
Sep 04
Mine 30
Nov 04
LS 8
Dec 04 |
Complaint to Legal
Services Ombudsman (LSO) 5
December 2004
LSO 17
Jan 05
LSO 27
Apr 05
LSO - Decision 12
May 05
Mine 22
May 05
LSO 7
Jun 05 |
Two
years and four months |
CONCLUSIONS
(1) c.200 hours of my
life (= FIVE WEEKS, based on
a 35-hour week) in relation to
my complaint against them and
the one year of ensuing battles
with them, the Law Society and
the Legal Services Ombudsman
(This is in addition to
the c.300 hours of my life -
much of these due to the need
to argue with them: my legal
and statutory rights; get them
to undertake what had been agreed)
(2) In the process, they - combined
with Mr
Stan Gallagher and Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor - have 'allegedly'
made me endure the most appalling
torment, anguish and distress
(3) They have also cost
me the following six months of
on-going battle with CKFT which,
among others, led me to have
to take more time off my annual
leave (visits to the Citizen
Advice Bureau, the court)
(NB. Piper Smith Basham
cost me £6,500 (US$11,300)
in fees (including £1,500
(US$2,600) (for counsels), and £1,500
in other costs, including 'allegedly'
loss of earnings) |
2003- 05 Stan Gallagher and Bar Council and Legal
Services Ombudsman and Lord
Falconer of Thoroton |
Complaint
to Stan
Gallagher / Arden Chambers
Mine 20
Jan 04
Reply 23
Jan 04
Mine 26
Jan 04
|
Complaint to Bar Council (BC) 5
Apr 04
BC 14
Apr 04
BC 28
Apr 04
Mine 3
May 04
BC 6
May 04
SG reply 9
Jun 04
Mine 29
Aug 04
SG 11
Oct 04
Mine 31
Oct 04 + 2
Nov 04
BC - Decision 27
Jan 05
Mine 25
Mar 05
BC 30
Mar 05
BC 3
Jun 05
Mine 22
Jun 05 |
Complaint to Legal
Services Ombudsman (LSO) 25
Mar 05
LSO 1
Apr 05
Mine 2
Apr 05
LSO 8
Apr 05
LSO - Decision 30
Aug 05 - agrees with BC: Gallagher: no malpractice |
Two
years and three months |
CONCLUSIONS
(1) over 250 hours of
my life (= over SEVEN WEEKS,
based on a 35-hour week) spent
on writing the complaint against
him and the one year of battles
that followed with him, the Bar
Council and the Legal Services
Ombudsman
(2) In the process, Mr
Gallagher - combined with Piper
Smith Basham and CKFT - has
made me endure the most appalling
torment, anguish and distress
(In addition, 'allegedly',
the loss of the majority of my
spare time from 13 November 2003
and, in fact, starting after
the 28 October 2002 meeting -
over 200 hours (= SIX WEEKS,
based on a 35- hour week), as
well as the time I continued
having to take off my annual
leave (visits to the Citizen
Advice Bureau, the courts) during
the on-going battle with CKFT,
as well as the courts over the
following seven months) |
2002- 05 Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor
and the Law Society and the Legal
Services Ombudsman and Lord Falconer of Thoroton |
Lanny Silverstone 7
Oct 02 threat of forfeiture if I fail to immediately pay £14,400 to his client SS = Andrew Ladsky
Mine 17
Oct 02
Silverstone 21
Oct 02
Mine 9
Aug 03
Mine 19
Dec 03
+ numerous other
letters |
Complaint to Law Society (LS) 20
Dec 04
LS - Decision 8
Feb 05
Mine 19
Feb 05
LS 17
Mar 05 |
Complaint to Legal
Services Ombudsman (LSO) 20
Feb 05
LSO - Decision 11
July 05 - agrees with LS: no malpractice |
One
year and seven months |
CONCLUSIONS
Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor,
its client Mr Andrew Ladsky and
his other puppets, Martin
Russell Jones and Mr
Brian Gale have cost
me over £75,000
(US$133,000) of my life-savings
and more than 9,000 hours of my life,
including the 18 months spent on
developing this website - at c.
40 hours per week. Based on a 35-hour
week, it amounts to FIVE YEARS
They are
a key part of the root cause of the indescribable
sheer utter hell I have gone
through since 2002.. and
they continue to make me go through
the same sheer utter hell now
On its own, the complaint
against Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor has cost me c. 200
hours of my life (= SIX WEEKS
of my life, based on a 35-hour
week), including the ensuing
battle with the Law Society and
referral of my complaint to the
Legal Services Ombudsman |
2006
Portner and Jaskel (PJ)
(see below for Year 2007-09) (see also Notices by landlord and My Diary, 18 February 2006) |
PJ 10 Feb 06 BOGUS "notice of first refusal"
Mine 3 Mar 06
PJ 6 Mar 06
Mine 11 Mar 06
PJ 14 Mar 06
Mine 30 Mar 06
PJ 3 Apr 06
Mine 30 Apr 06 (1.1MB) |
My 28 Feb 07 complaint to Fiona Woolf, President of the Law Society
Mrs Woolf 2 Mar 07 (forwarded my complaint to CEO of Legal Complaints Service)
30 Mar 07 Solicitors Regulation Authority decision: "unable to consider; matter older than 6 months" = GET LOST! |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
I hold the view that the 10 February 2006 "notice" sent by Portner and Jaskel was 'bogus' and that this action was motivated by malicious intent
While it led me to undertake a comprehensive search of the Land Registry titles for Jefferson House and to discover that Steel Services no longer has control of the last floor of Jefferson House, this exchange of correspondence has cost me in excess of 50 hours of my life, and c.£200
Portner and Jaskel has subsequently confirmed that its client is Andrew Ladsky - which I knew all along (see My Diary 3 October 2006 )
|
2007- 09 Portner and Jaskel (PJ) and Law Society
(See above for Year 2006)
(see above related: WLCC Year 2007 and Supreme Court Costs Office) |
PJ 16 Feb 07 threat of "bankruptcy, forfeiture and costs" if I fail to pay £8,937 to "Rootstock Overseas Corp", a company I have never heard of
Mine 25 Feb 07 never heard of company; statement not enclosed
PJ filed WLCC claim, 7WL00675, 27 Feb 07 against me, for £10,357
PJ 17 Apr 07 asking for "my defence"
PJ 1 May 07 to WLCC claiming only just received 19 Apr 07 Order
PJ 1 May 07 to WLCC copy 6 Apr 07 letter 'from' my website 'visitor' = a SET-UP by Ladsky and his mob
PJ 1 May 07 supplying 3 Apr 07 WLCC Notice Aknowledgment Service Filed
PJ 1 May 07 to me of what sent to WLCC
PJ 4 May 07 to inform me 8 May 2007 hearing cancelled
PJ 8 May 07 asking me copy my contesting jurisdiction of court
PJ 8 Jun 07 chasing me for my evidence contesting court's jurisdiction
My 30 Jun 07 letter supplying my 4 April 2007 Skeleton Argument
PJ 12 Jul 07 to send "Rootstock" title
My 12 Aug 07 reply
My 22 Aug 07 detailing my costs
Gary Williams, barrister, 22 Aug 07 Skeleton Argument
My 10 Sep 07 to send cheque for £293.70
Gary Williams, barrister, 26 Sep 07 Defence to my "Defence & Counterclaim"
PJ 4 Feb 08 standard disclosure
My 15 Mar 08 re. my allocation questionnaire
My 6 May 08 standard disclosure
My 16 May 08 request from std disclosure
My 19 May 08 Part 18 Request
PJ 19 May 08 supply of 7 Jan 08 airspace transaction for £1
My 21 May 08 to supply full copy of all of my standard disclosure
My 22 May 08 to supply outstanding documents - including 'sums claimed by year'
PJ 23 May 08 ccd WLCC suggesting 'multi track'
My (74 pg) 3 Jun 08 Witness Statement; (4 pg Main Points)
My 5 June 08: no reply to my Part 18 rqst; no witness statement
"Rootstock" 6 Jun 08 Notice of Discontinuance of "ALL of the claim" against me
My 26 Jun 08 statement of costs
My 22 Jul 08 Notice of Commencement of Assessment of Costs, and my Statement of Case for costs
Ladsky's 11 Aug 08 'points of dispute' re. my 26 Jun 08 Bill of Costs
My 26 Aug 08 reply to Ladsky's 11 Aug 08 'points of dispute' re. my 26 Jun 08 Bill of Costs, and application for assessment hearing
My 31 Oct 08 fax to confirm Detailed Assessment hearing on 4 Nov 08
3 Nov 08 fax from Portner to WLCC claiming had not been informed of hearing
My 11 Nov 08 amended Bill of Costs
"Rootstock" "14 Jan 09 "offer" of £4,500 "for all my costs"
My 19 Jan 09 reply rejecting "offer" + my 19 Jan 09 amended reply to 11 Aug 08 Points of Dispute + my extra costs and extra interest since 26 Jun 08 My 22 Jan 09 covering letter for delivery of bundle - and list of documents in bundle
"Roostock" costs at 30 Jan 09
My costs at 30 Jan 09
PJ 4 Feb 09 cheque for £2,640.72
My 9 Feb 09 acknowledgment of cheque |
My 28 Feb 07 complaint to Fiona Woolf, President of the Law Society
Mrs Woolf 2 Mar 07 (forwarded my complaint to CEO of Legal Complaints Service)
30 Mar 07 Solicitors Regulation Authority decision of "no malpractice" by Portner and Jaskel |
|
[ ] |
CONCLUSIONS
Since filing its 16 February 2007 unlawful threat of bankruptcy, followed by filing the fraudulent 27 February 2007 claim against me, Portner and Jaskel has cost me [ ]
The unlawful 16 February 2007 threat of bankruptcy has caused me an unbelievable amount of torment, anguish and distress.
And the horrendous nightmare has continued ever since following the filing of the fraudulent 27 February 2007 claim against me in West London County Court
[ ]
Back to list |
SURVEYORS |
SINCE 1989 Martin
Russell Jones and the Royal
Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) |
Several
files full of letters to Martin
Russell Jones since 1989.
Detail in my 2 Feb 05 complaint to RICS |
Complaint to the Royal
Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) 2
February 2005 (1MB)
RICS 1
March 2005
Mine 5
March 2005
Mine 21
March 2005
RICS 13
May 2005
Mine 17
May 2005
Mine 2
June 2005
RICS 10
June 2005
RICS 3
August 2005
Mine 14
October 2005
RICS 4
November 2005 |
RICS 14 August 2008 threat of legal proceedings
My 18 August 2008 reply asking for clarifications
RICS 21 August 2008 ignoring my reply and implied encouragement to Martin Rusell Jones to issue proceedings against me
My 4 September 2008 reply |
|
CONCLUSIONS
Martin
Russell Jones, its client
Andrew Ladsky and his other
puppets, Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor and Mr
Brian Gale, have cost me
over £75,000
(US$133,000) of my life-savings
and more than 9,000 hours of
my life, including the 18 months
spent on developing this website
- at c. 40 hours per week.
Based on a 35-hour week, it
amounts to FIVE YEARS
They are
a key part of the root cause of the indescribable
sheer utter hell I have gone
through over the last five years...
and they continue to make me go
through the same sheer utter hell
now
On its own,
the complaint against Martin
Russell Jones to the Royal
Institution of Chartered Surveyors has cost
me over 200 hours of my life
(= over SIX WEEKS of my life,
based on a 35-hour week), including
the eight months battle with
the Institution of Chartered
Surveyors |
2008 Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors |
RICS 14 Aug 08 trying to gag me by threatening proceedings if I don't remove material from my website - without providing evidence in support of accusations
Mine 18 Aug 08 asking for clarification
RICS 21 Aug 08 continues with threats - and no evidence
Mine 4 Sep 08 - "your complete turnaround on previous position"
END of threats! |
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
Another arrogant, self-important, self-serving bully trying its luck at shutting me up for exposing its true colours. In the process it costs me several more hours of my life (on top of what it cost me in relation to my complaint against Martin Russell Jones), as well as 'recorded delivery' postage costs..
Back to list |
ACCOUNTANTS |
2005- 06 Pridie
Brewster and the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) |
Mine
to Pridie Brewster 30
March 2005
Reply 15
April 2005
Mine 17
April 2005
Mine 9
May 2005
|
Complaint to the Institute of
Chartered Accountants in England
and Wales (ICAEW) 19
July 2005
Mine 2
August 2005
ICAEW 4
August 2005
ICAEW 23
August 2005
Mine 1
September 2005
ICAEW 6
September 2005
ICAEW 2
November 2005
Mine 7
March 2006
ICAEW 16
March 2006
ICAEW` 13
April 2006
Mine 17
May 2006
ICAEW 24
May 2006
Mine 6
June 2006
ICAEW 8
June 2006
Mine 12
July 2006
ICAEW 18
July 2006
ICAEW 29 August 2006
ICAEW 9 October 2006 |
|
One
year 5 months |
CONCLUSIONS
...and A HELL OF A LOT MORE - before - and since - due to fraudulent accounts.
Back to list |
HOUSING DEPARTMENT & LOCAL GOVERNMENT OMBUDSMAN |
2004- 05 Kensington & Chelsea Housing dept and Local Government Ombudsman and Mr
John Prescott's Office |
Mine 22
Jun 04
Tenancy Relations
Officer (TRO) to CKFT-MRJ 25
Jun 04
Mine 2
Jul 04
Mine 22
Jul 04
Mine 25
Jul 04
Mine 6
Aug 04
My complaint to my Ward Councillor 30
Aug 04
Mine to Chief Housing
Officer 10
Sep 04
Mine to Chief Housing
Officer 15
Sep 04 |
Complaint to Local
Government Ombudsman (LGO) 17
Sep 04
Ward Councillor 30
Sep 04
Mine to Ward Councillor 5
Oct 04
LGO 5
Oct 04
Chief Housing Officer 15
Oct 04
TRO 25
Oct 04
Mine to Chief Housing
Officer 11
Nov 04
Mine to TRO 11
Nov 04
LGO 16
Nov 04
Mine to LGO 17
Nov 04
LGO 17
Nov 04
Housing Dept Exec.
Director 16
Dec 04
LGO 26
Jan 05
LGO 9
Feb 05
Mine to LGO 27
Feb 05
LGO 14
Apr 05
Mine to LGO 17
Apr 05
LGO 12
May 05 |
My 22
Nov 04 letter to the
Parliamentary
Ombudsman (not a 'proper'
complaint as I did not go through
my Member of Parliament to file
my complaint) |
8
months (to get accounts -
that are not compliant) |
CONCLUSIONS
The battles with Kensington & Chelsea
Housing over a seven-month period
have cost me c. 150 hours of my life
(= over FOUR WEEKS, based on a 35-hour
week) The battle with the Local
Government Ombudsman has cost me another c.
100 hours of my life, including
my letter to the Parliamentary
Ombudsman (=nearly THREE WEEKS,
based on 35-hour week)
They have also cost me
c. £100 (US$180) in postage
costs
I also hold
Mr
John Prescott, then overall
head of Local Government responsible
for the battles I have had to
engage in with the council
and the ombudsman
Back to list |
MP, PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN |
2009- 10
My MP: Sir Malcolm Rifkind, and Parliamentary Ombudsman |
My 7 Mar 09 letter
11 Mar 09 reply = Get lost!
My 24 Mar 09 reply |
My 12 Jul 09 complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman against the London Leasehold Valuation Tribunal, West London County Court in 2002-04 and 2007-08, and Wandsworth County Court |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
Back to list |
POLICE |
2002
Kensington & Chelsea
Police (KCP) and Police Complaints
Authority and Metropolitan Police
Authority and Home
Office
(see also, below, 2003, 2007 and 2009-10) |
Crime
report BS
560 4102/02C 1st and 2nd
application as the first form was "lost" by
KCP police
Mine 21
Feb 02 |
Complaint to the Police Complaints
Authority (PCA) 13
Mar 02
DI Webster 19
Mar 02
Mine to DC Adams 25
Mar 02
PCA 25
Mar 02
Mine to DC Adams 26
Mar 02
Mine to DI Webster 2
Apr 02 - relating detail of events
DI Webster 23
Apr 02
KCP 9
May 02
KCP 20
Jun 02 |
Complaint to the Chair of the Metropolitan
Police Authority (MPA) 5
May 2002
MPA 13
May 2002
Mine to MPA 31
May 2002
MPA 5
June 2002
MPA 11
July 2002
Mine to MPA 4
August 2002
MPA 7
August 2002
And the 27
August 2003 reply from the
Home Office from being copied
on my
letter to the media |
eight months |
CONCLUSIONS
In the process, they have
caused me considerable torment,
anguish and distress, including
leaving me in the situation of
assuming that I now have a police
record - as a "complaint
has been fully recorded by the
police."
In addition to this, Kensington & Chelsea
police has also cost me more
of my time following its letters
of 27
January 2003 and 6
February 2003 - leading
me to reply on 11
February 2003
As with the Leasehold
Valuation Tribunal and West
London County Court , they have also
been the cause of my spending
a significant number of hours writing
to a dozen media
As the Home
Office is the overall head for
the police, I also hold it responsible
for events |
2003 Kensington & Chelsea Police (KCP) |
[ ] |
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
[ ] |
2007
Kensington & Chelsea Police (KCP) |
[ ] |
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
[ ] |
2009- 10 Kensington & Chelsea police, |
|
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
Back to list |
OTHERS |
Land
Registry (LR) and Lord Falconer
of Thoroton + My Diary |
Mine 28
March 2006
LR 4
April 2006
Mine 18
April 2006
LR 25
April 2006 |
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
The
Land Registry has wasted c. 30 hours
of my life (= nearly ONE WEEK, based
on a 35-hour week)
I also hold Lord
Falconer of Thoroton responsible
for events as the Land Registry
is one of his departments |
Financial
Services Authorities |
Mine 23
April 2005
FSA 12
May 2004
Complaint of 4
June 2005
FSA 20
June 2005
Mine 4
July 2005
FSA 26
July 2005 |
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
The
Financial Services Authority has
wasted c. 20 hours of my life
I am glad it has finally been exposed e.g. HBOS |
Royal
Mail (RM) |
Complaint 17
May 2005
Mine 14
June 2005
Mine 21
June 2005
Mine 10
September 2005
RM 15
September 2005
Mine 11
March 2006
RM 4
April 2006
Mine 3
July 2006
RM 12 July 2006
[ ] |
Postwatch
Much to my annoyance, I have unfortunately misled the reply agreeing that I have a complaint against the Royal Mail - My Diary 26 Nov 06
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
I
was not going to include my battle
with the Royal Mail (post office), mainly because
the replies acknowledge the content
of my letters i.e. have been read,
as well as communicate genuine
empathy, understanding and determination
to address the issue. A first
for me - on all counts - not only
from a public sector department,
but also from anybody I have approached
since the start of this nightmare
in 2002.
However, the unreliability
of the service is continuing
and is causing me a lot of anxiety
So far, the post office
has cost me about 20 hours of
my life.
Update, post the launch of my site - The unbelievable events that took place in October 2006 and November 2006 caused me, among others, an enormous amount of distress and an additional c. 50 hours of my time.
These events led me to contact Postwatch which supports my complaint.
Hence, for the FIRST TIME in my horrendous, five-year nightmare, I HAVE HAD A COMPLAINT UPHELD
But, after all these battles, I gave up on the Post Office, and opted for a PO Box in the private sector instead.. |
CONCLUSIONS
As a result of its very deliberate actions intended to cause me grief (My Diary 29 Dec 08 ; 23 Jan 09) (Question: AT WHOSE BEQUEST? Obviously, party/ies in Government upset with my exposing chapter and verse of my case on my website because it exposes them for what they are) - as well as depriving me of my mobile number for three months - as detailed in my 25 January 2009 letter to Hutchison 3G, it has cost me £140.14, comprising of :
Personal time: 13 hours (in truth, it cost me more than that) - which I charged at £9.25 per hour (the rate allowed by the courts for a Litigant in Person) = £120.25
Postage costs = £19.89
To this I added the £41.25 credit I had, and therefore claimed back £181.39.
In the end, I settled for £120.00
BUT, I also clock-up my second success with a watchdog (first with Postwatch) - even though Ofcom was not the right watchdog to contact. Isn't that great? When you've gone through the absolute, sheer utter hell I have been going through since 2002: TRUST ME. IT DOES FEEL GREAT to finally get some help. |
Back to list
(2) Examples of other letters / information
packs that have proved to be another complete
and utter waste of my time are those to MPs:
Back to list
(3) Summary of my more than 40 battles (excluding correspondence
to MPs - other than mine)
|
-
Over 20 COMPLAINTS (Up to 120
pages in length ), plus numerous 'cries for help' to individuals with the mandate to take action (For a list, see below, and My Diary 6 May 08 for a brief overview) (See above, letters to MPs)
- Over 300 LETTERS FROM
ME
- TAKING more than 4,000 HOURS
OF MY LIFE = over two years, based
on a 35-hour week... and keeps on going
Fair minded, reasonable
visitor to the site, please
remember that, as I was in full time employment until January 2008, I had to find
this time in the evenings, at
weekends and by using my annual
leave - which was not enough, leading me to buy extra days. (Yes = more costs)
These letters are in addition
to at least ANOTHER
700+ LETTERS I have had
to write since the beginning of
this horrendous and very traumatic
nightmare in 2002.
Fair minded, reasonable
visitor to the site, this is
why I have spent practically
all my evenings, weekends, and
the best part of my annual leave
tied to my desk and my computer since 2002. At October 2008, I calculate the total number of hours at c. 16,000 hours. Based on a 35-hour working week, it amounts to nealry NINE YEARS.
A NINE YEAR PRISON SENTENCE, suffering treatment which, I assume, if inflicted on prisoners of war, would be considered as inhuman under the Geneva Conventions. And I am NOT the criminal. I AM THE VICTIM.
And YES: it all stems from the fact that when, in July 2002, I was presented with a service charge demand for £14,400 (US$25,400) I 'dared' to ask the question: "what are going to spend it on?"
When I was writing this section, I kept
breaking down in tears as it brought
back the horror of what I have
been made to endure by the above-mentioned
parties.
The feeling of absolute and utter disgust took over the tears. I have resigned myself to an objective of continuing to accumulate the extremely shocking and truly sickening evidence of what can happen to a leaseholder who 'dares' to challenge FRAUDULENT service demands by a 'sacrosanct landlord' - in the hope that it will be a trigger for change (home # 17). Somebody has to do it.
Too many people are suffering at the hands of this barbaric, feudal system and its supporting infrastructure (e.g. media articles ; Comments ; my fellow leaseholders ; My Diary 22 Nov 08)
I have been going through
the most unbelievable, horrendous
hell - AND STILL DO - EVERY
DAY!
For more
than eight years now, MY LIFE
HAS BEEN TOTALLY, TOTALLY RUINED. |
|
This
correspondence took place in the
context of more than 40
BATTLES (for a brief overview see My Diary 6 May 2008) I have had to engage in
with (see also letters to MPs):
• Kensington & Chelsea police - in 2002
• Then the Police Complaints Authority - in 2002
• Followed by the Metropolitan Police Authority - in 2002
• Kensington & Chelsea police - in 2003
• The Leasehold Valuation Tribunal - in 2002-03
• Then the head of the LVTs - in 2003 • West London County Court - in 2002-04
• Wandsworth County Court - in 2004
• Then HMCS 'Customer Service' - in 2004
• Piper Smith Basham/Watton - in 2003-04
• Then the Law Society - in 2004
• Followed by the Legal
Services Ombudsman - in 2004-05
• Mr Stan Gallagher - in 2003-04
• Then the Bar Council -in 2004-05
• Followed by the Legal
Services Ombudsman - in 2005
• Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor (CKFT) - in 2002-04
• Then the Law Society - in 2004-05
• Followed by the Legal
Services Ombudsman - in 2005
• Kensington & Chelsea Housing Dept - in 2004
• Then the Local Government Ombudsman - in 2004-05
• Martin
Russell Jones (numerous battles) - since 1989
• Then the Royal Institution
of Chartered Surveyors - in 2005
• The Financial Services Authority - in 2005
• Pridie Brewster - in 2005
• Then the Institute
of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales - in 2005-06
• The Royal Mail (My Diary May 03 , 1 Jul 06 , Oct 06 , Nov 06)
• Portner and Jaskel in 2006 (Notices
by Landlord - 10 February
2006 + My Diary 18 Feb 06)
• The Land Registry
- in 2006 (Lord
Falconer of Thoroton + My Diary 28 Apri 06)
• Kensington & Chelsea police - in 2007 (liaising with my website Host; dealing - and suffering the consequences of Andrew Ladsky's false accusations at work)
• Portner and Jaskel in 2007-08
• The Law Society (# 4 and # 5 ) in relation to Portner and Jaskel - in 2007
• West London County Court - in 2007-08
• Her Majesty Court Service's Customer Service - in 2007-08, and letters to Jack Straw, 'Justice' Secretary (WLCC # 20 , # 25, as well as copying him on other letters # 23, # 29)
• The Supreme Court Costs Office - in relation to the 30 Jan 09 so-called 'hearing'
• Hutchison 3G mobile phone operator - battle in 2008-09 to transfer my number to another provider
• My MP, Sir Malcolm Rifkind, in 2009, battle to get my complaint referred to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
• The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman in 2009-10, following my 12 July 2009 complaint. Exactly ONE YEAR AFTER the initial 'get lost!', it led to the predictable 29 July 2010 final 'GET LOST!'
• Kensington & Chelsea police, Directorate of Professional Standards, Met Commissioner and Home Office Minister following my 28 May 2009 Subject Access Request. (I did not bother fighting with the 'Independent' Police Complaints Commission as it would have been another waste of time). And the battle continues.
• The Ministry of 'Justice' following my 2 January 2010 Subject Access Request
[ ] |
Back to list
(4) The root cause of my seven years of absolute, sheer, utter hell and the outcome: desperate, as MY SITUATION IS WORSE THAN EVER
 |
Fair
minded, reasonable visitor to the
site, when looking at the above,
consider that ALL
OF IT stems from the fact that:
• When, in July 2002,
I was presented with a service
charge demand of £14,400 (US$25,400) I 'dared'
to ask the question "what are
you going to spend it on?"
• I insisted on getting
a reply to what I consider to be
a perfectly reasonable question
to ask
• I did this in the
context of agreeing that
works needed to be carried out,
and I would consequently need to
pay my 'just and fair share' of
it - as I captured in my 19 October 2003 Witness
Statement (point 6) (My 19 October 2003 Witness Statement)
'Daring'
to ask this question - and pursue
the answer to it - has led me
to go through this most unbelievable,
horrendous hell since 2002. |
 |
What
have I achieved as a result of
going through this indescribable,
unbelievable hell that has led
me to lose the main part of
my life savings, has
totally ruined my life since
2002 - including suffering on-going
harassment, bullying, victimisation, abuse, intimidation, defamation of my name and my character, etc.?
NOTHING!
In 2006, at the time of launching the website...
... I wrote "in fact, my situation is worse than ever". I had four invoices from Martin Russell Jones amounting
to £44,246 (US$78,000) hanging over my head: £15,500 (US$27,300), £14,500 (US$25,600), £5,625 (US$9,900), £8,621 (US$15,200). (They were the trigger to my lauching the website) This is in spite of the fact that
I - eventually - accepted Steel
Services' ' offer '
of £6,350 (US$11,200) vs.
the original demand of £14,400 (US$25,400)
and obtained a Consent Order endorsed
by West
London County Court on 1
July 2004 . Legally,
I DID NOT OWE THIS SUM. ( CKFT # 6.6 , # 6.8 ; West London County Court # 9 - # 13 )
Ms Ayesha Salim, Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor , stated
in her 28
May 2004 letter to me, acceptance
of the Consent Order I had drafted
while, in her 15
June 2004 letter, she
stated having sent it to the
court for approval and sent
me a copy with her correspondence
of 14
July 2004. (Lord Falconer of Thoroton # 3 , WLCC # 14 , CKFT # 4 , # 6.4 )
The judge, in West
London County Court, issued an order
that the action against me be 'stayed' (open
to further proceedings) - in
spite of the court knowing (as
confirmed by the Court
Service ) that agreement
had been reached (Lord Falconer of Thoroton # 4 )
By becoming a 'lessee'
of Lavagna Enterprises ,
the landlord, Steel Services,
could no
longer fulfil major covenants (1.1MB)
in my
lease - as it no longer
had control of the last floor.
No financial institution
would lend under these circumstances (Headlessors , Owners identity # 3 , # 3.1 )
I have spent the best part of
my life savings c. £75,000
(US$133,000) (and a lot more since 2006) and cannot afford
to employ more legal advisers - of
which, not surprisingly, I have
now become extremely wary. (Lawyers, Courts & LSO )
In spite of the fact that I have
supplied with my complaints what
I consider to be very damning 'black
on white' evidence, none
of my complaints (as listed above) have
been upheld. (Legal Services Ombudsman , Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors , Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales - and, in 2007, Portner and Jaskel # 4 and # 5 )
Hence, I cannot get the redress
and just treatment I believe
I deserve.
In addition:
I have suffered libellous, scurrilous, defamatory statements made against
me to a tribunal and two courts,
as they had the effect of - falsely
- portraying me as a liar and a
cheat (the same highly libellous, scurrilous statements have also been captured
in a significant number of other
correspondences).
Has this false information been
captured by e.g. credit rating
agencies?
Some of these documents are in
the possession of other leaseholders,
hence, the public at large.
Kensington
and Chelsea police has "fully
recorded a complaint" against
me. Hence, I assume that I now
have a police
record.
Furthermore, in March 2007, Kensington & Chelsea police also made scurrilous statements against me by implying - without evidence in support - that I committed "a crime" on which it then backed down when challeged by my website Host. It also branded me as "a Nazi" for having German blood in me.
Launching the website in the hope of putting pressure on resolving my situation has had the net effect of lining me up for similar, highly vicious, sadistic, barbaric attacks - summarised on the home page.
In 2006, I stated that the above invoices were fraudulent (Pridie Brewster # 12 , Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor # 6.3 )
I demonstrated this in my 3 June 2008 Witness Statement in relation to the FRAUDULENT 27 February 2007 claim filed against me in West London County Court by Portner and Jaskel - which led to "ALL" of the claim against me being dropped on 6 June 2008 (Portner # 6 , # 29 , # 30 , # 31 , # 33) - and I further proved my position that: threat of forfeiture, of bankruptcy, as well as as courts claims = FRAUD TOOLS.
However, as can be seen in my Witness Statement, this victory has not changed my overall situation - nor my objectives in lauching the site.
|
Back to list
(5) What would a being from another planet - with strong moral principles of right and wrong - make of events, considering the root cause?
Consider that THE ROOT CAUSE OF ALL OF THIS IS...
...Mr Ladsky et. al. and their aides
deciding that I (and other leaseholders) would
be made to pay for this (2.4MB): the
CONSTRUCTION OF A PENTHOUSE FLAT, ADDITION
OF THREE OTHER FLATS AND RELATED WORKS
- FOR WHICH WE
ARE NOT LIABLE.
This pack (2.3MB), as well as this pack (1.1MB) contain key evidential documents.
As to the pay-off, it is evidenced by the block sale of flats in the latter part of 2006, beginning of 2007 which, of course, are in addition to the sale of the penthouse flat BGL 54 458 for £3.9 million (US$6.9 million) in December 2005, etc.
In October 2007, the selling price was £6,500,000 (US$11.5 millions)
Jefferson House
July 2002 |
|
Jefferson House
September 2005 |
To be more precise:
( PDF
of above diagram - at February 2006)
|
...and
'the system' deciding to give them
its full support
What would a being from
another planet - with strong
moral principles of right and
wrong - make of this?
That it
is a VERY SICK society heading
for 'meltdown'? |
Back to list
(6) 'NO', I am not a 'lone voice'. There
are 'weighty' voices that are highly critical
of the current state of affairs:
Government as a whole perceived as "not
fit for purpose"
• In April 2006, the Home
Office (with responsibility for the police) started
to come under fire from several corners leading
to the head being replaced. The new head was
reported as saying that he viewed the Home Office
as "not fit for purpose''
This
statement led a journalist at the Daily
Express , to write (16 June 2006)
"Contrary to Home Secretary John Reid's
declaration that his department is "not
fit for purpose" I would suggest that this
whole Government is "not fit for purpose" -
and the Home Office situation is just symptomatic
of a general uselessness throughout this administration"
I WHOLEHEARTEDLY AGREE with this journalist.
English local government described as "morally
corrupt"
• Article in The
Times of 16
August 2005 , in which the journalist
wrote:
"...LGO Watch... called for the setting
up of an independent local government
complaints commission to bring order
into a
system it described as "morally corrupt"
...the 2000 Act was supposed to herald
a regime of quality, efficiency and
leadership.
In fact, it has meant the
introduction of the payroll and pork-barrel
politics into English local government, along
with the acceleration of an arrogant,
managerial style of operation"
A court service and legal system criticized
by many, including the (then) Prime Minister, Mr Tony
Blair, the Governor of the Bank of England and
Sir David Clementi
• The 24
June 2006 issue of the Daily
Mail quotes Mr Tony Blair as saying that
"He called for judges to stand
up for "decent law-abiding folks" who
he said, "think the political and legal
establishment are out of touch on the issue
and they are right" .
But then, as stated in the article
"Ever since he promised to be 'tough on
crime, tough on the causes of crime' in 1993,
Tony Blair has been promising to overhaul the
criminal justice system. Unfortunately, since
coming to power in 1997, he keeps sticking
to the same script."
And, "unfortunately" , like previous
governments, crooked landlords and their
aides who commit criminal offences by stealing
from leaseholders, using harassment, blackmail,
bullying and intimidation tactics, etc.,
'mysteriously' do not come under Mr Tony
Blair's "tough
on crime" radar.
Maybe if rogue landlords and their aides were
teenagers, "decent law-abiding folks" like
me 'might' stand a chance of being treated
justly and fairly. On the other hand, in
a society that evidently regards landlords
as sacrosanct, with carte blanche to do
exactly as they please...maybe not.
• The Governor of the Bank
of England , in a speech, on 21
June 2006 , at the Lord Mayor's Banquet
for Bankers and Merchants of the City
of London at the Mansion House (pages
6 and 7) (NB: The highlights are all
mine)
"After 13 years, we have at last drawn a
line under the BCCI case, the most expensive
fishing expedition in history."
"It matters that there are simple,
clear and timely ways of resolving disputes"
"What the BCCI case revealed was a
legal system incapable of guaranteeing that"
"How can a case described by the
trial judge himself as built "not even on
sand but on air" take thirteen
years and over £100 million (US$177
million) in costs to come to a conclusion?"
"As Mr Justice Lightman argued in his 2003
Edward Bramley Memorial Lecture, the adversarial
system imposes huge costs on litigants and
defendants alike"
"As he put it, "to the great majority of
the public the perception (if not the reality)
is that the legal system is a profitable
monopoly of the lawyers" . BCCI showed
that perception was indeed reality.
"A system that is powerless to prevent
a case so hopelessly misconceived continuing
for thirteen years requires examination.
I
very much hope that the Government
will look carefully at this case, learn the
lessons, and take steps to ensure that such
an outcome can never occur again"
Many of these conclusions, insights
and questions apply in my case - as indeed
they do in what is likely to be the majority
of landlord-tenant cases.
In fact, I reflected some of the above sentiments
one and a half year prior to this speech in the
process of referring my
complaint against the Law Society to the
Legal
Services Ombudsman for its handling of my
complaint against CKFT , as I wrote:
"This is my first ever experience with a
court.
At the time the claim was filed against
me, I held the very naïve view that a
court was there to ensure justice - and would
therefore assist me.
I have now come to conclude
that they are just 'paper pushers'- and not
even good at that" (page 2) (see West
London County Court and Lord
Falconer of Thoroton )
"It reinforced my view that Steel Services
i.e. Mr Ladsky et. al was 'running the show'
in West London County Court " (page 3)
Needless to say that the Legal
Services Ombudsman,
who reports to Lord Falconer, Head of the Department
for Constitutional Affairs, made a point of noting
these comments against one of her 'sister departments'
in her
reply (page 2) (I wish she had been as diligent in noting the points in my complaints)
Subsequent note - Actually, more evidence to add as further endorsement of my claim that courts are 'paper pushers': see My Diary 9 March 2007 and 4 April 2007 for damning evidence in relation to the fraudulent claim of 29 November 2002, as well as another fraudulent claim filed against me on 27 February 2007
Talking to numerous leaseholders 'battling
it out' in court with their landlord leads
me to the conclusion that many of these cases
should not even be entertained by the courts.
Instead, as in my case, the courts just
'sit back' - ignoring all calls for assistance
- and evidence supplied... leaving 'the
fraternity' i.e. lawyers coming out as the
key beneficiaries.
• Sir David Clementi 's
conclusions following his review of the legal
profession (as reported in the Financial
Times of 16 December 2004)
"The current regulatory system
is flawed."
"It has insufficient regard to the
interests of consumers"
"I am not satisfied that the main frontline
bodies have always put consumer interests ahead
of their own interests"
• Extracts from an article in the Law
Gazette of 1 April 2005:
"The Bar Council has made
a U-turn over its plans to challenge a High
Court judge's ruling that its complaints procedure
is in breach of human rights law . "
"The Visitors' judgment could lead
to hundreds of disciplinary cases being reopened"
The chartered surveyors - managing agents sector
in which "no action is taken against serious
professional incompetence" and in which
an "almighty shake-up is required to clean-up
the sector and improve standards"
• Professor Sir Bryan Carsberg who,
following his 2006 survey of the Royal
Institution of Chartered Surveyors found - to his "surprise" that
the
"RICS does not, as a matter of course, take
action against [its] members' serious
professional incompetence"
• The Estates
Gazette (one of the sector's
leading publications), in its 7 January
2006 issue
"The internal RICS complaints
procedure cannot be said to inspire widespread
confidence..."
"...But it is also a bed of its own making:
the system seems set up to investigate
frivolous complaints often just because
they are made, while the serious issues brought
to its attention.are not vigorously
tackled"
• The MD of a firm of managing
agents was reported
in the 10
June 2006 issue of the Estates
Gazette as saying (in relation to
gross over-charging on insurance
premiums by managing agents)
"The alternative is that managing agents
improve the professionalism of their service."
"It will take an almighty shake-up
to clean up the sector and improve standards"
I REST MY CASE.
ALL THOSE LISTED ABOVE AS PARTIES IN
MY MORE THAN 40 BATTLES HAVE CAUSED ME TO DEVELOP
THIS WEBSITE - AND MAINTAIN IT.
THIS OUTCOME IS OF THEIR OWN DOING .
Back to top
|
